Mohammed Abdelazis, Polisario Front Chief |
The journey is not yet finished (118)
(Part one hundred and eighteen, Depok, West Java,
Indonesia, 27 September 2014, 1:08 pm)
Not all places in the world to feel freedom, free from
the shadows of colonialism and now still have to fight for freedom as experienced
by the population of Western Sahara which is now struggling to escape the
Moroccan occupation.
Western Sahara
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Western Sahara
الصحراء الغربية
Aṣ-Ṣaḥrā’ al-Ġarbiyya
Taneẓroft Tutrimt
Sáhara Occidental
Western Sahara region
Countries and
regions: (Southern Provinces (Morocco), SADR
Countries and territories Morocco
Southern Provinces
SADR
Population 548,000[1][a]
Area 266,000 sq.km.
(103,000 sq.mi.)
Languages Arabic,
Berber Hassaniya Arabic
, Spanish
Religion Islam
Time Zones UTC+00:00
(Morocco time)
Currencies
Moroccan dirham [b]
Algerian dinar [c][2]
Mauritanian ouguiya [d]
Sahrawi peseta
The Western Sahara (US Listeni/ˌwɛstərn səˈhærə/; UK /ˌwɛstən
səˈhɑrə/; Arabic: الصحراء الغربية Aṣ-Ṣaḥrā’ al-Gharbīyah; Spanish: Sahara
Occidental; Berber: Taneẓroft Tutrimt) is a disputed territory in the Maghreb
region of North Africa, bordered by Morocco to the north, Algeria to the
extreme northeast, Mauritania to the east and south, and the Atlantic Ocean to
the west. Its surface area amounts to 266,000 square kilometres (103,000 sq
mi). It is one of the most sparsely populated territories in the world, mainly
consisting of desert flatlands. The population is estimated at just over
500,000,[3] of whom nearly 40% live in El Aaiún (also spelled Laâyoune), the
largest city in Western Sahara.
Occupied by Spain since the late 19th century, the
Western Sahara has been on the United Nations list of non-self-governing
territories since 1963 after a Moroccan demand.[4] It is the most populous
territory on that list, and by far the largest in area. In 1965, the UN General
Assembly adopted its first resolution on Western Sahara, asking Spain to
decolonise the territory.[5] One year later, a new resolution was passed by the
General Assembly requesting that a referendum be held by Spain on
self-determination.[6]
Western Sahara Map |
In 1975, Spain relinquished the administrative control of
the territory to a joint administration by Morocco (which had formally claimed
the territory since 1957)[7] and Mauritania.[6] A war erupted between those
countries and the Sahrawi national liberation movement, the Polisario Front,
which proclaimed the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) with a
government-in-exile in Tindouf, Algeria. Mauritania withdrew in 1979, and
Morocco eventually secured effective control of most of the territory,
including all the major cities and natural resources.
Since a United Nations-sponsored ceasefire agreement in
1991, two thirds of the territory (including most of the Atlantic coast
line)[8] has been controlled by Morocco and the remainder by the SADR, strongly
backed by Algeria.[9] Internationally, countries such as the United States and
Russia have taken a generally ambiguous and neutral position on each side's
claims, and have pressed both parties to agree on a peaceful resolution. Both
Morocco and Polisario have sought to boost their claims by accumulating formal
recognition, essentially from African, Asian, and Latin American states in the
developing world. The Polisario Front has won formal recognition for SADR from
82 states, and was extended membership in the African Union. Morocco has won
recognition or support for its position from several African governments and
from most of the Arab League.[10][11] In both instances, recognitions have,
over the past two decades, been extended and withdrawn according to changing
international trends.[citation needed] As of 2006, no other member state of the
United Nations has recognized Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara.[12]
Map of Western Sahara.
The earliest known inhabitants of the Western Sahara were
the Berber people of the Gaetulian tribes. Depending on the century, Roman-era
sources describe the area as inhabited by Gaetulian Autololes or the Gaetulian
Daradae tribes. Berber heritage is still evident from regional and place-name
toponymy, as well as from tribal names.
Other early inhabitants of the Western Sahara may be the
Bafour[13] and later the Serer and some Arabian tribes. The Bafour were later
replaced or absorbed by Berber-speaking populations which eventually merged in
turn with the migrating Beni Hassan Arabian tribe.
The arrival of Islam in the 8th century played a major
role in the development of the Maghreb region. Trade developed further, and the
territory may have been one of the routes for caravans, especially between
Marrakesh and Tombouctou in Mali.
In the 11th century, the Maqil Arabian tribes (fewer than
200 individuals) settled in Morocco (mainly in the Draa valley, between the
Melwiya river, Tafilalet and Taourirt).[14] Towards the end of the Almohads'
rule, the Beni Hassan tribe (a sub-tribe of the Maqil) were called by the local
ruler of the Sous to quell a rebellion, they settled in the Sous Ksours and
controlled such cities as Taroudant.[14] During the Merinid rule, the Beni
Hassan rebelled but were defeated by the Sultan and escaped beyond the Saguia
el-Hamra dry river.[14][15] The Beni Hassan then were at constant war with the
Lamtuna nomadic Berbers of the Sahara. Over roughly five centuries, through a
complex process of acculturation and mixing seen elsewhere in the Maghreb and
North Africa, some of the indigenous Berber tribes mixed with the Maqil Arabian
tribes and formed a culture unique to Morocco and Mauritania.[citation needed]
Western Sahara People |
Spanish province[edit]
See also: Spanish Sahara and Spanish Morocco
After an agreement among the European colonial powers at
the Berlin Conference in 1884 on the division of spheres of influence in
Africa, Spain seized control of The Western Sahara and established it as a
Spanish colony.[16] After 1939 and the outbreak of World War II, this area was
administered by Spanish Morocco. As a consequence, Ahmed Belbachir Haskouri,
the Chief of Cabinet, General Secretary of the Government of Spanish Morocco,
cooperated with the Spanish to select governors in that area. The Saharan lords
who were already in prominent positions, such as the members of Maa El Ainain
family, provided a recommended list of candidates for new governors. Together
with the Spanish High Commissioner, Belbachir selected from this list.[citation
needed] During the annual celebration of Muhammad's birthday, these lords paid
their respects to the caliph to show loyalty to the Moroccan monarchy.[citation
needed]
As time went by, Spanish colonial rule began to unravel
with the general wave of decolonization after World War II; former North
African and sub-Saharan African possessions and protectorates gained
independence from European powers. Spanish decolonization proceeded more
slowly, but internal political and social pressures for it in mainland Spain
built up towards the end of Francisco Franco's rule. There was a global trend
towards complete decolonization. Spain began rapidly to divest itself of most
of its remaining colonial possessions. By 1974–75 the government issued
promises of a referendum on independence in the Western Sahara.
At the same time, Morocco and Mauritania, which had historical
and competing claims of sovereignty over the territory, argued that it had been
artificially separated from their territories by the European colonial powers.
Algeria, which also bordered the territory, viewed their demands with
suspicion, as it also had a long-running rivalry with Morocco. After arguing
for a process of decolonization to be guided by the United Nations, the
Algerian government under Houari Boumédiènne in 1975 committed to assisting the
Polisario Front, which opposed both Moroccan and Mauritanian claims and
demanded full independence of the Western Sahara.
The UN attempted to settle these disputes through a
visiting mission in late 1975, as well as a verdict from the International
Court of Justice (ICJ). It acknowledged that Western Sahara had historical
links with Morocco and Mauritania, but the population of this territory
possessed the right of self-determination. On 6 November 1975 Morocco initiated
the Green March into Western Sahara; 350,000 unarmed Moroccans converged on the
city of Tarfaya in southern Morocco and waited for a signal from King Hassan II
of Morocco to cross the border in a peaceful march. A few days before, on 31
October, Moroccan troops invaded Western Sahara from the northwest[citation
needed].
Demands for independence[edit]
Commemoration of the 30th independence day from Spain in
the Liberated Territories (2005)
In the waning days of General Franco's rule, and after
the Green March, the Spanish government signed a tripartite agreement with
Morocco and Mauritania as it moved to transfer the territory on 14 November
1975. The accords were based on a bipartite administration, and Morocco and
Mauritania each moved to annex the territories, with Morocco taking control of
the northern two-thirds of Western Sahara as its Southern Provinces, and
Mauritania taking control of the southern third as Tiris al-Gharbiyya. Spain
terminated its presence in Spanish Sahara within three months, repatriating
Spanish remains from its cemeteries.[17]
Western Sahara Female |
The Moroccan and Mauritanian annexations were resisted by
the Polisario Front, which had gained backing from Algeria. It initiated
guerrilla warfare and, in 1979, Mauritania withdrew due to pressure from
Polisario, including a bombardment of its capital and other economic targets.
Morocco extended its control to the rest of the territory. It gradually
contained the guerrillas by setting up the extensive sand-berm in the desert
(known as the Border Wall or Moroccan Wall) to exclude guerrilla fighters.
Hostilities ceased in a 1991 cease-fire, overseen by the peacekeeping mission
MINURSO, under the terms of a UN Settlement Plan.
Stalling of the referendum and Settlement Plan[edit]
The referendum, originally scheduled for 1992, foresaw
giving the local population the option between independence or affirming
integration with Morocco, but it quickly stalled. In 1997, the Houston
Agreement attempted to revive the proposal for a referendum but likewise has
hitherto not had success. As of 2010, negotiations over terms have not resulted
in any substantive action. At the heart of the dispute lies the question of who
qualifies to be registered to participate in the referendum, and, since about
the year 2000, Morocco considers that since there is no agreement on persons
entitled to vote, a referendum is not possible. Meanwhile, Polisario still
insisted on a referendum with independence as a clear option, without offering
a solution to the problem of who is qualified to be registered to participate
in it.
Both sides blame each other for the stalling of the
referendum. The Polisario has insisted on only allowing those found on the 1974
Spanish Census lists (see below) to vote, while Morocco has insisted that the
census was flawed by evasion and sought the inclusion of members of Sahrawi
tribes which escaped from Spanish invasion to the north of Morocco by the 19th
century.
Efforts by the UN special envoys to find a common ground
for both parties did not succeed. By 1999 the UN had identified about 85,000
voters, with nearly half of them in the Moroccan-controlled parts of Western
Sahara or Southern Morocco, and the others scattered between the Tindouf
refugee camps, Mauritania and other places of exile. Polisario accepted this
voter list, as it had done with the previous list presented by the UN (both of them
originally based on the Spanish census of 1974), but Morocco refused and, as
rejected voter candidates began a mass-appeals procedure, insisted that each
application be scrutinized individually. This again brought the process to a
halt.
According to a NATO delegation, MINURSO election
observers stated in 1999, as the deadlock continued, that "if the number
of voters does not rise significantly the odds were slightly on the SADR
side".[18] By 2001, the process had effectively stalemated and the UN
Secretary-General asked the parties for the first time to explore other,
third-way solutions. Indeed, shortly after the Houston Agreement (1997),
Morocco officially declared that it was "no longer necessary" to
include an option of independence on the ballot, offering instead autonomy.
Erik Jensen, who played an administrative role in MINURSO, wrote that neither
side would agree to a voter registration in which they were destined to lose
(see Western Sahara: Anatomy of a Stalemate).
Baker Plan[edit]
Main article: Baker Plan
Polisario Soldier |
System of the Moroccan Walls in Western Sahara set up in
the 1980s
As personal envoy of the Secretary-General, James Baker
visited all sides and produced the document known as the "Baker
Plan".[19] This was discussed by the United Nations Security Council in
2000, and envisioned an autonomous Western Sahara Authority (WSA), which would
be followed after five years by the referendum. Every person present in the
territory would be allowed to vote, regardless of birthplace and with no regard
to the Spanish census. It was rejected by both sides, although it was initially
derived from a Moroccan proposal. According to Baker's draft, tens of thousands
of post-annexation immigrants from Morocco proper (viewed by Polisario as
settlers but by Morocco as legitimate inhabitants of the area) would be granted
the vote in the Sahrawi independence referendum, and the ballot would be split
three ways by the inclusion of an unspecified "autonomy", further
undermining the independence camp. Morocco was also allowed to keep its army in
the area and retain control over all security issues during both the autonomy
years and the election. In 2002, the Moroccan king stated that the referendum
idea was "out of date" since it "cannot be implemented";[20]
Polisario retorted that that was only because of the King's refusal to allow it
to take place.
In 2003, a new version of the plan was made official,
with some additions spelling out the powers of the WSA, making it less reliant
on Moroccan devolution. It also provided further detail on the referendum
process in order to make it harder to stall or subvert. This second draft,
commonly known as Baker II, was accepted by the Polisario as a "basis of
negotiations" to the surprise of many.[21] This appeared to abandon
Polisario's previous position of only negotiating based on the standards of
voter identification from 1991 (i.e. the Spanish census). After that, the draft
quickly garnered widespread international support, culminating in the UN
Security Council's unanimous endorsement of the plan in the summer of 2003.
End of the 2000s[edit]
Ambox current red.svg
Parts of this article (those related to the Manhasset
negotiations (not in article)) are outdated. Please update this article to
reflect recent events or newly available information. (September 2013)
North Western Sahara landscape.
Baker resigned his post at the United Nations in 2004;
his term did not see the crisis resolved.[22] His resignation followed several
months of failed attempts to get Morocco to enter into formal negotiations on
the plan, but he met with rejection. The new king, Mohammed VI of Morocco,
opposes any referendum on independence, and has said Morocco will never agree
to one: "We shall not give up one inch of our beloved Sahara, not a grain
of its sand."[23]
Instead, he proposes, through an appointed advisory body
Royal Advisory Council for Saharan Affairs (CORCAS), a self-governing Western
Sahara as an autonomous community within Morocco. His father, Hassan II of
Morocco, initially supported the referendum idea in principle in 1982, and in
signed contracts with Polisario and the UN in 1991 and 1997. No major powers
have expressed interest in forcing the issue, however, and Morocco has shown
little interest in a real referendum.
The UN has put forth no replacement strategy after the
breakdown of Baker II, and renewed fighting has been raised as a possibility.
In 2005, former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan reported increased
military activity on both sides of the front and breaches of several cease-fire
provisions against strengthening military fortifications.
Morocco has repeatedly tried to get Algeria into
bilateral negotiations, based on its view of Polisario as the cat's paw of the
Algerian military. It has received vocal support from France and occasionally
(and currently) from the United States. These negotiations would define the
exact limits of a Western Sahara autonomy under Moroccan rule but only after
Morocco's "inalienable right" to the territory was recognized as a precondition
to the talks. The Algerian government has consistently refused, claiming it has
neither the will nor the right to negotiate on the behalf of the Polisario
Front.
Demonstrations and riots by supporters of independence
and/or a referendum broke out in the Moroccan-controlled parts of Western
Sahara in May 2005 and in parts of southern Morocco (notably the town of Assa).
They were met by police. Several international human rights organizations
expressed concern at what they termed abuse by Moroccan security forces, and a
number of Sahrawi activists have been jailed. Pro-independence Sahrawi sources,
including the Polisario, have given these demonstrations the name
"Independence Intifada", while most sources have tended to see the
events as being of limited importance. International press and other media
coverage has been sparse, and reporting is complicated by the Moroccan
government's policy of strictly controlling independent media coverage within
the territory.
Dakhla Bay, near Dakhla.
Demonstrations and protests still occur, even after
Morocco declared in February 2006 that it was contemplating a plan for
devolving a limited variant of autonomy to the territory but still explicitly
refused any referendum on independence. As of January 2007, the plan had not
been made public, though the Moroccan government claimed that it was more or
less complete.[24]
Polisario has intermittently threatened to resume
fighting, referring to the Moroccan refusal of a referendum as a breach of the
cease-fire terms, but most observers seem to consider armed conflict unlikely
without the green light from Algeria, which houses the Sahrawis' refugee camps
and has been the main military sponsor of the movement.
Polisario Front Troops |
In April 2007, the government of Morocco suggested that a
self-governing entity, through the Royal Advisory Council for Saharan Affairs
(CORCAS), should govern the territory with some degree of autonomy for Western
Sahara. The project was presented to the UN Security Council in mid-April 2007.
The stalemating of the Moroccan proposal options has led the UN in the recent
"Report of the UN Secretary-General" to ask the parties to enter into
direct and unconditional negotiations to reach a mutually accepted political
solution.[25]
In October 2010 Gadaym Izik camp was set up near El Aaiun
as a protest by displaced Sahrawi people about their living conditions. It was
home to more than 12,000 people. In November 2010 Moroccan security forces
entered Gadaym Izik camp in the early hours of the morning, using helicopters
and water cannon to force people to leave. The Polisario Front said Moroccan
security forces had killed a 26-year-old protester at the camp, a claim denied
by Morocco. Protesters in Laayoune threw stones at police and set fire to tires
and vehicles. Several buildings, including a TV station, were also set on fire.
Moroccan officials said five security personnel had been killed in the
unrest.[26]
On 15 November 2010, the Moroccan government accused the
Algerian secret services of orchestrating and financing the Gadaym Izik camp
with the intent to destabilize the region. The Spanish press was accused of
mounting a campaign of disinformation to support the Saharwi initiative, and
all foreign reporters were either prevented from travelling or else expelled
from the area.[27] The protest coincided with a fresh round of negotiations at
the UN.[28]
Politics[edit]
See also: Politics of Western Sahara, Foreign relations
of Morocco and Foreign relations of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic
A police checkpoint in the suburbs of Laayoune.
Sovereignty over Western Sahara is contested between
Morocco and the Polisario Front and its legal status remains unresolved. The
United Nations considers it to be a "Non-Self-Governing Territory".
Formally, Morocco is administered by a bicameral
parliament under a constitutional monarchy. The last elections to the
parliament's lower house were deemed reasonably free and fair by international
observers.[citation needed] Certain powers, such as the capacity to appoint the
government and to dissolve parliament, remain in the hands of the monarch. The
Morocco-controlled parts of Western Sahara are divided into several provinces
that are treated as integral parts of the kingdom. The Moroccan government
heavily subsidizes the Saharan provinces under its control with cut-rate fuel
and related subsidies, to appease nationalist dissent and attract immigrants
from Sahrawis and other communities in Morocco proper.[29]
The exiled government of the self-proclaimed Sahrawi Arab
Democratic Republic (SADR) is a form of single-party parliamentary and
presidential system, but according to its constitution, this will be changed
into a multi-party system at the achievement of independence. It is presently
based at the Tindouf refugee camps in Algeria, which it controls. It also
controls the part of Western Sahara to the east of the Moroccan Wall, known as
the liberated territories. This area has a very small population, estimated to
be approximately 30,000 nomads.[30] The Moroccan government views it as a
no-man's land patrolled by UN troops. The SADR government whose troops also
patrol the area have proclaimed a village in the area, Bir Lehlou, as SADR's
provisional capital.
Western Sahara City |
Human rights[edit]
Main article: Human rights in Western Sahara
A sangar (fortification) from the Western Sahara
conflict. The fortification is built of rocks on top of a mesa overlooking the
Grart Chwchia, Al Gada, Western Sahara. The Sangar is facing north and was
probably built by the Sahrawis in the 1980s.
Sahrawi human-rights defender Ali Salem Tamek in Ait
Meloul Prison, Morocco.[31]
The Western Sahara conflict has resulted in severe human
rights abuses, constantly reported by external reporters and HR activists,[32]
most notably the displacement of tens of thousands of Sahrawi civilians from
the country, the expulsion of tens of thousands of Moroccan civilians by the
Algerian government from Algeria,[33] and numerous casualties of war and
repression.
During the war years (1975–91), both sides accused each
other of targeting civilians. Moroccan claims of Polisario terrorism has
generally little to no support abroad, with the US, EU, AU and UN all refusing
to include the group on their lists of terrorist organizations. Polisario
leaders maintain that they are ideologically opposed to terrorism, and insist
that collective punishment and forced disappearances among Sahrawi civilians
[34] should be considered state terrorism on the part of Morocco.[35] Both
Morocco and the Polisario additionally accuse each other of violating the human
rights of the populations under their control, in the Moroccan-controlled parts
of Western Sahara and the Tindouf refugee camps in Algeria, respectively.
Morocco and organizations such as France Libertés consider Algeria to be
directly responsible for any crimes committed on its territory, and accuse the
country of having been directly involved in such violations.[36]
Morocco has been repeatedly criticized for its actions in
Western Sahara by international human rights organizations such as:
Amnesty International[37]
Human Rights Watch[38][39]
World Organization Against Torture
Freedom House[40]
Reporters Without Borders[41]
International Committee of the Red Cross
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights[42]
Derechos Human Rights[43]
Defend International[44][45]
Front Line[46][47][48][49]
International Federation of Human
Rights[50][51][52][53][54]
Society for Threatened Peoples[55][56]
Norwegian Refugee Council[57]
POLISARIO has received criticism from the French
organization France Libertes on its treatment of Moroccan prisoners of war,[58]
and on its general behaviour in the Tindouf refugee camps in reports by the
Belgian commercial counseling society ESISC, or European Strategic Intelligence
and Security Center.[59][60] A number of former Polisario officials who have
defected to Morocco accuse the organisation of abuse of human rights and
sequestration of the population in Tindouf.[61][62]
Administrative divisions[edit]
Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic[edit]
Wilayah (see Provinces of Western Sahara)
Daerah (see Districts of Western Sahara)
Moroccan regions and provinces[edit]
Three Moroccan regions are within or partly within
Western Sahara:
Guelmim-Es Semara Region
Es Semara Province
Laâyoune-Boujdour-Sakia El Hamra Region
Boujdour Province
Laâyoune Province
Oued Ed-Dahab-Lagouira Region
Aousserd Province
Oued Eddahab Province
Morocco controls territory to the west of the berm
(border wall) while the Sahrawi Republic controls territory to the east (see
map on right).
Dispute[edit]
Main article: Political status of Western Sahara
See also: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1979
Remains of the former Spanish barracks in Tifariti after
the Moroccan air strikes in 1991.
The Western Sahara was partitioned between Morocco and
Mauritania in April 1976, with Morocco acquiring the northern two-thirds of the
territory.[63] When Mauritania, under pressure from Polisario guerrillas,
abandoned all claims to its portion in August 1979, Morocco moved to occupy
that sector shortly thereafter and has since asserted administrative control
over the whole territory.[63] The official Moroccan government name for Western
Sahara is the "Southern Provinces", consisting of the Río de Oro and
Saguia el-Hamra regions.
The portion not under the control of the Moroccan
government is the area that lies between the border wall and the actual border
with Algeria (for map see Minurso map). The Polisario Front claims to run this
as the Free Zone on behalf of the SADR. The area is patrolled by Polisario
forces,[64] and access is restricted, even among Sahrawis, due to the harsh
climate of the Sahara, the military conflict and the abundance of land mines.
Landmine Action UK undertook preliminary survey work by visiting the
Polisario-controlled area of Western Sahara in October 2005 and February–March
2006. A field assessment in the vicinity of Bir Lahlou, Tifariti and the berms
revealed that the densest concentrations of mines are in front of the berms.
Mines were laid in zigzags up to one meter apart, and in some parts of the
berms, there are three rows of mines. There are also berms in the
Moroccan-controlled zone, around Dakhla and stretching from Boujdour, including
Smara on the Moroccan border. However, mine-laying was not restricted to the
vicinity of the berms; occupied settlements throughout the Polisario-controlled
areas, such as Bir Lahlou and Tifariti, are ringed by mines laid by Moroccan
forces.[65]
Despite this, the area is traveled and inhabited by many
Sahrawi nomads from the Tindouf refugee camps of Algeria and the Sahrawi communities
in Mauritania.[30] United Nations MINURSO forces are also present in the area.
The UN forces oversee the cease-fire between Polisario and Morocco agreed upon
in the 1991 Settlement Plan.[66]
The Polisario forces (of the Sahrawi People's Liberation
Army, SPLA) in the area are divided into seven "military regions",
each controlled by a top commander reporting to the President of the Polisario
proclaimed Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic.[64][67] The total size of the
Polisario's guerrilla army present in this area is unknown, but it is believed
to number a few thousand men, despite many combantants being demobilized due to
the cease-fire.[67] These forces are dug into permanent positions, such as gun
emplacements, defensive trenches and underground military bases, as well as
conducting mobile patrols of the territory.[64][68][not in citation given]
A demonstration in Madrid for the independence of the
Western Sahara.
Topography of Western Sahara.
Major Sahrawi political events, such as Polisario congresses
and sessions of the Sahrawi National Council (the SADR parliament in exile) are
held in the Free Zone (especially in Tifariti and Bir Lehlou), since it is
politically and symbolically important to conduct political affairs on Sahrawi
territory. In 2005, MINURSO lodged a complaint to the Security Council of the
United Nations for "military maneuvers with real fire which extends to
restricted areas" by Morocco.[69] A concentration of forces for the
commemoration of the Saharawi Republic’s 30th anniversary[70] were however
subject to condemnation by the United Nations,[71] as it was considered an
example of a cease-fire violation to bring such a large force concentration
into the area. In late 2009, Moroccan troops performed military maneuvers near
Umm Dreiga, in the exclusion zone, violating the cease-fire. Both parties have
been accused of such violations by the UN, but to date there has been no
serious hostile action from either side since 1991.
Annual demonstrations against the Moroccan Wall are staged
in the region by Sahrawis and international activists from Spain, Italy, and
other mainly European countries. These actions are closely monitored by the
UN.[72][not in citation given]
During the joint Moroccan–Mauritanian control of the
area, the Mauritanian-controlled part, roughly corresponding to Saquia
el-Hamra, was known as Tiris al-Gharbiyya.
Geography[edit]
Main article: Geography of Western Sahara
Western Sahara is located in Northern Africa, bordering
the North Atlantic Ocean, between Mauritania and Morocco. It also borders
Algeria to the northeast.
The land is some of the most arid and inhospitable on the
planet. The land along the coast is low, flat desert and rises, especially in
the north, to small mountains reaching up to 600 metres (2,000 ft) on the
eastern side.
While the area can experience flash flooding in the
spring, there are no permanent streams. At times a cool off-shore current can
produce fog and heavy dew.
Economy[edit]
Main article: Economy of Western Sahara
Aside from its rich fishing waters and phosphate reserves
Western Sahara has few natural resources and lacks sufficient rainfall and
fresh water resources for most agricultural activities. The territory has one
of the world’s largest reserves of phosphate deposits located in Bou Craa which
is owned by the Office Cherifien des Phosphates, a Moroccan state
agency.[73][clarification needed] There is speculation that there may be
off-shore oil and natural gas fields, but the debate persists as to whether
these resources can be profitably exploited, and if this would be legally
permitted due to the Non-Self-Governing status of Western Sahara (see below).
Western Sahara's economy is based almost entirely on
fishing and phosphate mining which employs two thirds of its work force.[73]
Some lesser extent agriculture and tourism also contribute to the territory's
economy. Most food for the urban population comes from Morocco. All trade and
other economic activities are controlled by the Moroccan government.(as its
defacto southern province) The government has encouraged citizens to relocate
to the territory by giving subsidies and price controls on basic goods. These
heavy subsidies have created a state-dominated economy in the
Moroccan-controlled parts of Western Sahara.
Polisario Front Troops |
Recently leaked United States diplomatic cables reveal
that the territory is somewhat an economic burden for Morocco;[73] the Moroccan
$800 million US subsidy program to Western Sahara was said to be one of the
largest per-capita aid programs in history.[73] Supporting life in a territory
with scarce fresh water resources is extremely costly. For example, the entire
drinking water for the city of Laayoune comes from desalinization facilities
and costs 3 US dollars per cubic meter but is sold at the national price of 0.0275
US dollars; the difference is paid for by the government of Morocco.[73] Fuel
is sold at half the price, and basic goods are heavily subsidized;[73]
businesses operating in the territory do not pay taxes.[73] All of this is done
to keep the balance of Western Sahara's finances.[73] The territory is
otherwise thought to be economically unviable and unable to support its
population without the Moroccan subsidies.[74] The cable concluded that the
territory is unlikely to ever be of any economic benefit for Morocco even if
offshore oil fields were to be discovered and exploited.[73]
Due to the disputed nature of Moroccan sovereignty over
the territory, the application of international accords to Western Sahara is
highly ambiguous. Political leadership of trade agreement signatories such as
the United States (US-Morocco Free Trade Agreement) and Norway (European Free
Trade Association trade accord) have made statements as to these agreements'
non-applicability—although practical policy application is ambiguous.[75][76][77]
Exploitation of natural resources[edit]
Satellite image of El Aaiún, the capital of Western
Sahara
After reasonably exploitable oil fields were located in
Mauritania, speculation intensified on the possibility of major oil resources
being located off the coast of Western Sahara. Despite the fact that findings
remain inconclusive, both Morocco and the Polisario have signed deals with oil
and gas exploration companies. US and French companies (notably Total and
Kerr-McGee) began prospecting on behalf of the Moroccan Office National de
Recherches et d’Exploitations Petrolières (ONAREP).[78]
In 2002, Hans Corell, Under-Secretary General of the
United Nations and head of its Office of Legal Affairs issued a legal opinion
on the matter.[78] The opinion was rendered following an analysis of relevant
provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, the United Nations General
Assembly resolutions, the case law of the International Court of Justice and
the practice of sovereign states.[78] It concluded that while the existing
exploration contracts for the area were not illegal, "if further
exploration and exploitation activities were to proceed in disregard of the
interests and wishes of the people of Western Sahara, they would be in
violation of the principles of international law."[78] After pressures
from corporate ethics-groups, Total S.A. pulled out in late 2004.[79]
In May 2006, the remaining company Kerr-McGee also left
following sales of numerous share holders like the National Norwegian Oil Fund,
due to continued pressure from NGOs and corporate groups.[80]
The European Union fishing agreements with Morocco
include Western Sahara.
In a previously confidential legal opinion (published in
February 2010, although it was forwarded in July 2009), the European
Parliament’s Legal Service opined that fishing by European vessels under a
current EU – Morocco fishing agreement covering the Western Sahara’s waters is
in violation of international law.[81]
Similarly, the exploitation of phosphate mines in Bou
Craa has led to charges of international law violations and divestment from
several European states.[82]
Demographics[edit]
Main article: Demographics of Western Sahara
Morocco built several empty towns in Western Sahara,
ready for Refugees coming back from Tindouf[83]
The indigenous population of Western Sahara is usually
known in Western media as Sahrawis. But they are also referred to in Morocco as
"Southerners" or "Southern Berbers". They are
Hassaniya-speaking or Berber-speaking tribes of Berber origin. Many of them
have mixed Berber-Arab heritage, effectively continuations of the tribal
groupings of Hassaniya-speaking and Zenaga-Berber speaking Moorish tribes
extending south into Mauritania and north into Morocco as well as east into
Algeria. The Sahrawis are traditionally nomadic bedouins with a life style very
similar to that of the Tuareg Berbers from whom Sahrawis most likely have
descended, and they can be found in all surrounding countries. War and conflict
has led to major population displacement.
As of July 2004, an estimated 267,405 people (excluding
about 160,000 Moroccan military personnel) lived in the Moroccan-controlled
parts of Western Sahara. Many people from parts of Morocco have come to live in
the territory, and these latest arrivals are today thought to outnumber the
indigenous Western Sahara Sahrawis. The precise size and composition of the
population is subject to political controversy.
The Polisario-controlled parts of Western Sahara are
barren. This area has a very small population, estimated to be approximately
30,000 in 2008.[30] The population is primarily made up of nomads who engage in
herding camels back and forth between the Tindouf area and Mauritania. However,
the presence of mines scattered throughout the territory by the Moroccan army
makes it a dangerous way of life.
Spanish census and MINURSO[edit]
A 1974 Spanish census claimed there were some 74,000
Sahrawis in the area at the time (in addition to approximately 20,000 Spanish
residents), but this number is likely to be on the low side, due to the
difficulty in counting a nomad people, even if Sahrawis were by the mid-1970s
mostly urbanized. Despite these possible inaccuracies, Morocco and the
Polisario Front agreed on using the Spanish census as the basis for voter
registration when striking a cease-fire agreement in the late 1980s, contingent
on the holding of a referendum on independence or integration into Morocco.
In December 1999, the United Nations' MINURSO mission
announced that it had identified 86,425 eligible voters for the referendum that
was supposed to be held under the 1991 Settlement plan and the 1997 Houston
accords. By "eligible voter" the UN referred to any Sahrawi over 18
years of age that was part of the Spanish census or could prove their descent
from someone who was. These 86,425 Sahrawis were dispersed between
Moroccan-controlled Western Sahara and the refugee camps in Algeria, with
smaller numbers in Mauritania and other places of exile. These numbers cover
only Sahrawis 'indigenous' to the Western Sahara during the Spanish colonial
period, not the total number of "ethnic" Sahrawis (i.e., members of
Sahrawi tribal groupings), who also extend into Mauritania, Morocco and
Algeria. The number was highly politically significant due to the expected
organization of a referendum on self-determination.
The Polisario has its home base in the Tindouf refugee
camps in Algeria, and declares the number of Sahrawi population in the camps to
be approximately 155,000. Morocco disputes this number, saying it is
exaggerated for political reasons and for attracting more foreign aid. The UN
uses a number of 90,000 "most vulnerable" refugees as basis for its
food aid program.
Culture[edit]
Main article: Culture of Western Sahara
See also: Western Saharan cuisine
The major ethnic group of the Western Sahara are the
Sahrawis, a nomadic or Bedouin ethnic group speaking the Hassānīya dialect of
Arabic, also spoken in much of Mauritania. They are of mixed Arab-Berber
descent, but claim descent from the Beni Hassan, an Arab tribe that have
migrated across the desert in the 11th century.
Physically indistinguishable from the Hassaniya speaking
Moors of Mauritania, the Sahrawi people differ from their neighbours partly
because of different tribal affiliations (as tribal confederations cut across
present modern boundaries) and partly as a consequence of their exposure to
Spanish colonial domination. Surrounding territories were generally under
French colonial rule.[citation needed]
Like other Saharan Bedouin and Hassaniya groups, the
Sahrawis are mostly Muslims of the Sunni branch and the Maliki fiqh. Local
religious custom (Urf) is, like other Saharan groups, heavily influenced by
pre-Islamic Berber and African practices, and differs substantially from urban
practices. For example, Sahrawi Islam has traditionally functioned without
mosques in the normal sense of the word, in an adaptation to nomadic
life.[citation needed]
The original clan-/tribe-based society underwent a
massive social upheaval in 1975 when the war forced part of the population to
settle in the refugee camps of Tindouf, Algeria, where they remain. Families
were broken up by the dispute.
The Museum of the Sahrawi People's Liberation Army is
located in this refugee camp. This museum is dedicated to the struggle for the
independence of Western Saharan people. It presents weapons, vehicles and
uniforms, as well as abundant documentation history.
Cross-cultural influence[edit]
The contemporary history of the territory has experienced
long-term international presence and occupation that has deeply influenced the
cultural practices of the people, such as languages spoken throughout the
territory and its institutions.[84] Spanish colonization lasted roughly from
1884-1976, following the creation of the Madrid Accords where Spain absolved
all responsibility over the territory and left it to Morocco and
Mauritania.[85]
Throughout the nine decades of Spanish colonial presence,
one of the primary spoken languages in the Western Sahara came to be Spanish.
The reasons for its widespread usage was due to the necessity of communicating
with Spanish leadership and administrators throughout the territory, whom
ultimately established institutions modeled after those of Spain.[84] The
importance and prevalence of Spanish has persisted to the present day, even
after Spanish withdrawal from the Western Sahara in 1976, due to various
education exchanges and host programs for Sahrawi children to Spain and
Cuba.[86]
One such exchange program to Spain is Vacaciones en Paz
(Vacations in Peace), which is an annual holiday program that was created in
1988 and is organized by the Union of Sahrawi Youth (UJSARIO) in collaboration
with 300 other associations throughout Spain.[87] The program itself allows
7,000 to 10,000 Sahrawi children between the ages of 8 and 12 the opportunity
to live in Spain for the summer outside of the refugee camps. Sometimes
children return to the same Spanish household year after year while they are
still eligible, and forge strong relationships with their host families.[87]
These types of exchange programs that successfully create cross-border and
cross-cultural relationships reinforce the usage of the Spanish language
throughout subsequent generations of Sahrawi children.
Gender relations[edit]
Much Spanish literature and recent refugee studies
scholarship has been dedicated to the exploration of the major role women play
in Sahrawi society, and the degree of freedom they experience within the
occupied territory and the refugee camps. There is a consensus among Sahrawi
women that they have always enjoyed a large degree of freedom and influence
within the Sahrawi community.[88]
Traditionally, Sahrawi women have played pivotal roles in
Sahrawi culture, as well as in efforts to resist colonialism and foreign interference
in their territory.[89] Similar to other nomadic traditions on the African
continent, Sahrawi women traditionally exercised significant power and occupied
leadership roles both in the camp and in their tents. Women were present, and
at times dominant, in both the public and private spheres of Sahrawi life.
Sahrawi women could inherit property, subsist
independently from their fathers, brothers, husbands, and other male
relatives.[89] Women were key for establishing alliances through marriage, being
that the Sahrawi culture values monogamy, with their tribe and to others.[90]
Furthermore, Sahrawi women were endowed with major responsibility for the camp
during long periods of absence by the men of the camp due to war or trade.
Among the responsibilities women had were setting up, repairing, and moving the
tents of the camp, and participating in major tribal decisions.[91]
Morrocco Troops in Western Sahara |
In the contemporary history of the Western Sahara, women
have occupied central roles and been highly represented in the political
sphere.[92] During Spanish colonial rule, Sahrawi women actively provided
financial and physical support to the resistance movements during the 1930s,
50s, and the late 1960s.[89] In more official ways, women were consistently
part of the Sahrawi National Liberation Movement, otherwise known as the Frente
Polisario, which in 1994 created the National Union of Sahrawi Women
(NUSW).[92] The NUSW was structured at the local, regional, and national levels
and concentrated on four areas: the occupied territories and emigration,
information and culture, political and professional development, and foreign
affairs.[92]
Art and cultural expression[edit]
FiSahara International Film Festival is an annual film
festival that takes place in one of the southwestern refugee camps in
Algeria.[93] At this event, actors, directors, and film industry insiders from
around the world join the Sahrawi people for a week-long festival of
screenings, parallel activities, and concerts. The festival provides
entertainment and educational opportunities for Sahrawi refugees alongside
cultural celebrations for visitors and spectators. It aims to raise awareness
of the humanitarian crises in the refugee camps, and expose the Sahrawi people
to this medium of art and expression.[94]
Highly renowned Spanish filmmakers and actors, such as
Javier Bardem, Penelope Cruz, and Pedro Almodóvar have supported and attended
the festival. In 2013, the festival screened over 15 films from around the
world including comedies, short films, animations, and documentaries. Some of
the films were made by the refugees themselves.[95] Art as embodied in film has
been a strong and popular medium that Sahrawi youth have used to express
themselves, and share their stories of conflict and exile.
ARTifariti, the International Art and Human Rights
Meeting in Western Sahara, is an annual art workshop set up in the Liberated
Zone and refugee camps, specifically in Tifariti, that brings artists from all
over the world. This event led to the introduction of graffiti art to the
camps, and popular graffiti artists have come to the workshop to work with
refugees.[96] One such artist was Spanish street artist MESA, who travelled to
the Sahrawi refugee camps in 2011 and displayed his own graffiti throughout the
landscape .[97] His canvases of choice were destroyed walls, which he brought
back to life through his art.
MESA inspired other Sahrawis to express themselves and
embody their national struggle through art and graffiti. One such artist is
Mohamed Sayad, a Sahrawi artist that has been transforming the refugee camp
landscape by creating works of art amongst the devastation in camps that have
existed for four decades.[97] His canvases, much like MESA, are walls that have
been ruined by massive floods in the Sahrawi refugee camps in southwestern
Algeria. Sayad's work tells a consistent story, one that draws on his
experience of protracted conflict and a life under Moroccan occupation. Sayad's
graffiti depicts aspects of Sahrawi culture, and includes actual Sahrawi people
as his subjects.[97]
Western Sahara profile
A mainly desert territory in north-west Africa, Western
Sahara is the subject of a decades-long dispute between Morocco and the
Algerian-backed Polisario Front.
The territory is phosphate-rich and believed to have
offshore oil deposits. Most of it has been under Moroccan control since 1976.
Western Sahara fell under Spanish rule in 1884, becoming
a Spanish province in 1934.
A gradual increase in national consciousness and
anticolonial sentiment during the subsequent decades led to a guerrilla
insurgency by the Spanish Sahara's indigenous inhabitants, the nomadic
Saharawis, in the early 1970s.
The Polisario Front was set up on 10 May 1973 and
established itself as the sole representative of the Saharan people. Some
100,000 refugees still live in Polisario's camps in Algeria.
Polisario rebels
Polisario Front rebels parade during a ceremony marking
their declaration of independence
Madrid Agreement
In October 1975 the International Court of Justice
rejected territorial claims by Morocco and Mauritania. The court recognised the
Saharawis' right to self-determination and Spain agreed to organise a
referendum.
But in November 1975, Moroccan King Hassan II ordered a
"Green March" of over 300,000 Moroccans into the territory. Spain
backed down and negotiated a settlement with Morocco and Mauritania, known as
the Madrid Agreement.
Continue reading the main story
At a glance
Seized by Morocco after Spain and Mauritania withdrew
Polisario Front seeks independence
Morocco only prepared to grant autonomy
Territory rich in phosphates, fisheries and possibly
offshore oil
Cease-fire in place since 1991
Country profiles compiled by BBC Monitoring
Signed on 14 November 1975, the deal partitioned the
region. Morocco acquired two-thirds in the north and Mauritania the remaining
third. Spain agreed to end colonial rule.
Polisario declared the Saharan Arab Democratic Republic
(SADR) on 27 February 1976 and announced its first government on 4 March.
The current SADR president, Mohamed Abdelaziz, was
elected Polisario secretary-general in August 1976.
In August 1978, one month after a coup, a new Mauritanian
government signed a peace deal with Polisario and renounced all territorial
claims.
Morocco moved to occupy areas allocated to Mauritania.
Algeria in turn allowed refugees to settle in its southern town of Tindouf,
where Polisario still has its main base.
Polisario led a guerrilla war against Moroccan forces
until 1991.
Referendum
In April 1991 the UN established Minurso, the United
Nations Mission for a Referendum in Western Sahara. Its brief was to implement
a peace plan outlined in a 1990 Security Council resolution. In September 1991
a UN-brokered ceasefire was declared.
Morocco's Green March
Moroccan settlers head for Western Sahara during the
'Green March'
1884: Spain colonises Western Sahara
1973: Polisario set up
1975: World Court rules people should decide on
sovereignty
1975: "Green March", Spain agrees to hand over
to Morocco, Mauritania
1976: Spain withdraws, SADR declared
1979: Morocco annexes Mauritania's share
1976-1991: Guerrilla warfare
1991: Minurso established
1991: Ceasefire declared
1996: UN suspends referendum moves
2001: Baker plan
2007-8: Talks fail to reach resolution
The peace plan provided for a transition period, leading
to a referendum in January 1992. Western Saharans would choose between
independence and integration with Morocco.
Minurso was to total 1,000 civilian and 1,700 military
personnel. Its brief was to monitor the ceasefire, the confinement of warring
parties to designated areas and the exchange of prisoners.
While the ceasefire held, the mission was never fully
deployed. Nor was the transition period ever completed. A key sticking point
was an "identification process", to decide who was eligible to vote.
Identification was to be based on a census carried out by
Spain in 1973. Polisario wanted to rule out Moroccans who settled in Western
Sahara after the Green March.
In May 1996 the UN suspended the identification process
and recalled most Minurso civilian staff. Military personnel stayed to oversee
the truce.
Initial attempts to revive the process foundered over
Morocco's worries that a referendum would not serve its interests.
Baker plan
Peace returned to the drawing board when UN special envoy
James Baker mediated in talks between Polisario and Morocco in London, Lisbon
and Houston in 1997, then in London again in 2000.
Agreements were reached on the release of POWs, a code of
conduct for a referendum campaign, UN authority during a transition period -
but not on voter eligibility. Further talks were held in Berlin and Geneva in
2000, but again ran into trouble.
In a new bid to break the deadlock, James Baker submitted
a "Framework Agreement", known as the Third Way, in June 2001.
It provided for autonomy for Saharawis under Moroccan
sovereignty, a referendum after a four-year transition period, and voting
rights for Moroccan settlers resident in Western Sahara for over a year.
This formula was rejected by Polisario and Algeria. Then
in July 2003, the UN adopted a compromise resolution proposing that Western
Sahara become a semi-autonomous region of Morocco for a transition period of up
to five years.
A referendum would then take place on independence,
semi-autonomy or integration with Morocco.
This compromise was seen as addressing Moroccan concerns,
in a bid to entice it to agree to a referendum.
Impasse
Polisario signalled its readiness to accept, but Morocco
rejected the plan, citing security concerns. Envoy James Baker resigned in June
2004 and the UN process remains deadlocked.
Talks resumed between Morocco and the Polisario Front in
March 2008 in New York, with Mauritania and Algeria also attending. They made
no progress.
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice sought to break
the impasse during a visit to North Africa in September, but the pursuit of
al-Qaeda networks in Morocco and Algeria took precedence.
In January 2009 UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon
appointed US diplomat Christopher Ross as his new special envoy to deal with
Western Sahara. Mr Ross was once US ambassador to Algeria.
In November 2010, several people were killed in violent
clashes between Moroccan security forces and protesters near the capital
Laayoune, shortly before UN-mediated talks on the future of the territory were
due to open in New York.
More recently, the US has backed calls for the UN to
monitor human rights in the territory, prompting another rift with Morocco. The
US redeployed forces intended for joint military exercises in Morocco in April
2013 after Morocco cancelled them. (bbc) (continoe)
No comments:
Post a Comment