!-- Javascript Ad Tag: 6454 -->

Saturday, January 25, 2014

East Kalimantan Governor Awang Faroek Suggest moved to the East Kalimantan capital Jakarta

Balikpapan City
East Kalimantan Governor Awang Faroek Suggest moved to the East Kalimantan capital Jakarta

East Kalimantan Governor Awang H Faroek Dr. Isaac floated the idea ready to be the capital of East Kalimantan of Indonesia replacing Jakarta , which has been packed and do not have adequate carrying capacity of the environment .

This expression by Awang Faroek leveled when entertaining team ekspediasi 4x4 off-road touring to East Kalimantan border area , which was attended by the Chairman of the International Off -road Federation ( IOF ) , General Pol . Pur . Rusmanhadi , Saturday night in Samarinda .

" Perhaps it floated the idea to the Central Government to move the state capital to Kalimantan ? Why maintain a crowded city of Jakarta , traffic jams and sometimes floods , " he asked sejumah off-road expedition participants from various provinces in Indonesia .

According to Awang Faroek , the discourse moved to the state capital of Borneo is great , let alone President Sukarno never prepared Provnsi Central Kalimantan Jakarta as a potential replacement for that time .

According to him , Kaltim ventured to propose as a relocation site for the state capital of East Kalimantan has many potential . Among them , the land is still very wide , population density is still very little , has complete facilities such as airports, ports and arrangement of cargo and passengers that the city can still redesign as needed in the nation's capital .

" So sorry for the people of Central Kalimantan alone , though never in the discourse of the state capital of Central Kalimantan , East Kalimantan but has a number of advantages , not shared by other provinces in Kalimantan , primarily airports and seaports, " he said .
In addition , he is in the East Kalimantan East Kalimantan Indonesian archipelagic sea lanes II which will be the entrance to the eastern part of Indonesia . Moreover , progress ALKI II between the sea and the island of Sulawesi, East Kalimantan will be the entrance and exit merchant ships from East Asia .
According to him , the discourse for the transfer of the capital of East Kalimantan to this course should have the support of all levels of society , especially the DPRD Kaltim and local leaders . Moreover, a proposed course of this discourse should notexists harm and supported by all parties .

 " We want the economic growth is not only concentrated in Java . Let's look like in the United States and Australia have developed cities other than the capital of the country . Suffice Jakarta as a city of trade and services , "he said .


Discourse proposed transfer of the capital city of Jakarta to Borneo again emerged as the Governor of East Kalimantan ( Kaltim ) , Awang Ishak Faroek expressed its readiness if Kaltim believed to shift the seat of government of Jakarta as Indonesia in the future .

Responding to the statement , the Indonesian Employers Association ( Apindo ) considered that the removal of the Capital to the discourse of East Kalimantan governor merely a dream come true that would be difficult .


Move the Capital ? It seems this idea we often hear these days . But wait , the former president also had the idea to move the Indonesian capital of Jakarta to other cities . They already predict Jakarta will be crowded and not ideal for being a state capital . Sukarno had the idea to move the capital to Palangkaraya , Central Kalimantan in 1957. Suharto was never initiated the same thing , the seat of government moved to Jonggol , Bogor . But both the president 's intention not materialize or forwarded .

Actually move the seat of government is not new . The nation's capital is a very dense city , where much history has taken place , due to political and economic functions that have happened there . However , sometimes government leaders decided to move the capital from one city to another . Relocation of the capital has been done hundreds of times throughout history . Ancient Egypt , Rome , and China are most often replace capital. Some countries choose a new capital is more easily maintained in the event of war . Some of the new capital was planned and built in previously undeveloped areas , to spur development .

The following 5 States Successful Move capital , becoming a better country :

1 . Brazil
The capital of Brazil , Rio de Janeiro , has a full , crowded , and too far to the other states . The government built Brasilia in 1956 and 1960 . The transfer of the capital has been considered for decades previously . In 1961 Brazil officially became the capital of Brazil . Brazil experienced unprecedented growth . Changes in Capital of Brazil is considered very successful , and many countries have been inspired by the success of Brazil in moving the country 's capital .

2 . Australia
In the 19th century , Sydney and Melbourne are the two largest cities in Australia . The two countries compete to be the capital of Australia . Taking the middle ground , Australia decided to build a new capital . After conducting research and surveys , the New South Wales Government is set to be Australia . Canberra became the capital city of Australia in 1927 .

3 . Myanmar
Myanmar was once the capital of Rangoon . In November 2005 , the government instructed by the military junta to move the capital to Naypyidaw , which had been built since 2002. The world still has not got a definitive explanation , why the capital of Myanmar moved . The capital of this controversial removal , based on astrological advice and political fears . Rangoon is the largest city in the country, and the government limits so that no protests against the government . Naypyidaw is also considered to be more easily maintained during the war .

4 . India
Calcutta , located in Eastern India , was the capital of British India in the colonial period until 1911 . To make it easier to regulate the administration of the whole of India , the capital was transferred to Delhi by the British . New Delhi was built , and officially became the capital in 1947 .

5 . USA
After the American Revolution , Americans hold Congress in 8 states . Construction of a new capital in a separate federal district has been written in the U.S. Constitution . President George Washington chose the area near the Potomac River . Washington DC was built , and became the capital of the United States in 1800 .
In my opinion , the United States has a mature design and succeeded in mapping the state's functions , such as :
- Washington DC for government center
- New York for business center
- Hollywood to the center of the film industry
- Las Vegas for entertainment center
These four states running the same synergy and become famous by America in the eyes of the world .

Well , if the State had a Successful Move capital , following a failed state in moving capital :

1 . Japan
In 1990 , the Diet ( Japanese Parliament ) passed a resolution to move the Japanese capital of Tokyo . In a few weeks , the committee gives the option for the location of new capital to the Prime Minister , such as Tokai , Hokuto , and Mie - Kio . Dietary want to move the capital from Tokyo to ease " excessive concentration " of the political and economic functions in the city . In addition , the government losses in the earthquake in Tokyo is huge . Due to the large removal costs ( U.S. $ 150-350 billion ) , the Opposition suggested that such investment should be used to make better Tokyo and improve preparedness against earthquakes .


2 . Malaysia

Malaysia moved to Putrajaya administrative center in 1995 to alleviate overcrowding in Kuala Lumpur . The plan is designed Putrajaya able to accommodate 500 thousand people, aka half the population of Kuala Lumpur . However, most people are reluctant to move to KL Putrajaya because it is far from the business center . Though the Malaysian government has done a variety of ways , such as incentives and direct motorway wants to move to Putrajaya . But these methods have not produced results to date .

3 . Argentina
Failure to move the capital due to lack of funds experienced by Argentina in 1989 . Argentina had planned moving the capital of Buenos Aires to Viedma . The move has been decided by the state capital of Argentina 's National Congress in May 1987 . The effort stalled because of the economic problems that hit Argentina in 1989 .


: State is planning to move its capital



1 . Iran
Iran considering moving the capital from Tehran , which is commonly affected by the earthquake . If capital is a different city , the government can manage the crisis and reduce casualties . Political leaders and seismologists are studying the area near Qom and Isfahan as a place to build a new capital , but this will probably take several decades and a large amount of money to complete .

2 . Indonesia
Jakarta is densely populated , traffic jams, slums , and flooding , making the idea of ​​moving the capital of Indonesia often sticking . However , a lack of traction and the pros and cons of government in the transfer of capital , making this idea into a wild ball which will obviously not where they lead , into an idea that sometimes appear , sometimes drowning .

Indonesia needs to learn from countries that succeed or fail in the transfer of the capital , and with a very carefully discussing the removal of the state capital 's discourse . Depth studies involving various stakeholders at central and regional necessary to determine the best choice of the state capital redeployment scenarios . The decision will be the transfer of the capital of the country 's largest and most important public works projects in the history of the nation of Indonesia .

No comments:

Post a Comment