Chairman of the House of Representatives Budget Achmadi Supit Noor denies any problems in the budget discussions in Banggar mechanism. This Supit statement addressing the findings of Center Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (INTRAC) about 20 members Banggar with suspicious transactions.
"It's not an issue mechanism. Culture of corruption that is so pervasive. Now if we see no problem with the discussion in Banggar," said Supit, Thursday (01/03/2013), when contacted by reporters.
The problem, he said, when there are members of council who tried to take advantage of budget discussions for the benefit of certain parties. "If someone already has the intention, he could have been corruption," said Vice Chairman of the Golkar Party faction.
Supit susceptibility was accused of corruption would occur at the level of the budget commission. The reason for this project is discussed in the ministry or agency commission by any partner. "The opportunity to deviate in the Commission. At Banggar just finalized, there is no significant change in Banggar," said Supit.
According Supit, to fix the corruption should start from the executive. Bureaucrats, according to him, being the most vulnerable to corruption. Needed a total overhaul mental bureaucrats.
DANA redundant
Supit also recognizes the opportunities for corruption arises because of the opportunity. Opportunities for corruption which occurs when there is a budget allocation that exceeds the needs. Budget funds are wasted that is what played a lot of parties for personal gain.
"Now each sector of high ego, proposed projects, there is no control mechanism. Many areas this build but not as needed. Much redundant, well this is utilized," he said.
Previously, PPATK has reported that 20 members of the House Banggar have fat bank accounts and indications of corruption to the Commission. Of the 20 people, there is an accumulated value of transactions reached hundreds of billions of dollars.
"A suspicious transactions undertaken by the members of Banggar it ranges hundreds of millions of dollars to billions of dollars per transaction. If accumulated, there is a value of transactions reached hundreds of billions of dollars," said Head of INTRAC Muhammad Yusuf.
According to Joseph, there are some considerations that are used to declare the members indicated that Banggar corruption. First, Banggar activities vulnerable to corruption because of the state budget to take care of hundreds of trillions of dollars.
Second, the frequency of financial transactions Banggar members that do not fit her profile as a member of Parliament. Flow into the accounts of cash transactions that generally Banggar PPATK could not detect the origin of the money
Center for Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis to date has reported 18 members of the House Budget with fat bank accounts and indications of corruption to the Corruption Eradication Commission. Of the 18 people, there were accumulated value of transactions reached hundreds of billions of dollars.
"A suspicious transactions undertaken by the members of Banggar it ranges hundreds of millions of dollars to billions of dollars per transaction. If accumulated, there is a value of transactions reached hundreds of billions of dollars, "said Head of INTRAC Muhammad Yusuf, Wednesday (26/12) in Jakarta.
According to Yusuf, INTRAC submit a report on the results of analysis (LHA) related 18 members Banggar it gradually to the KPK. Besides fat accounts Banggar members, PPATK also reported a number of members of the House of Representatives fat bank accounts. However, Joseph did not explain how the number of members of the House in question.
From 2003 until June 2012, INTRAC received more than 2,000 reports of suspicious financial transactions (LTKM) Banggar related members of the financial services provider. INTRAC and analyze suspicious transaction to ascertain whether or not criminal indications. INTRAC has analyzed about 1,000 more LTKM. From the analysis of known that there are 18 members who have accounts Banggar fat.
According to Joseph, there are some considerations that are used to express the Commission's 18 members Banggar indicated corruption. First, Banggar activities prone to corruption due to taking care of hundreds of trillions of dollars the state budget. Second, the frequency of the 10-member Banggar financial transactions that do not fit her profile as a member of Parliament. Flow into the accounts of cash transactions that generally Banggar PPATK could not detect the origin of the money.
Joseph explained, LHA members Banggar reported to the Commission is an initiative of INTRAC. So, LHA reported PPATK not always associated with cases being handled by the KPK.
In response to a number of related PPATK LHA accounts belonging to members Banggar unnatural, Johan said the KPK still can not directly carry out an investigation, or even menyidiknya. "Still there should be a review of the LHA such. We carefully again, if anything to do with the cases we handle. If no relation, obviously it helped the handling of cases in KPK, "he said.
He gave an example, the Commission has requested the data LHA be suspicious transaction on behalf of the Democratic Party, Angelina Sondakh aka Angie. Angie is now a defendant in the corruption trial of the case of alleged corruption in the budget discussions the Ministry of Education and Culture and the Ministry of Youth and Sports. Commission revealed there are at least 16 suspicious flows to Angie.
However, Johan admitted, despite having no data related to LHA from INTRAC suspicious transactions and accounts belonging unnatural Angie, the Commission has not been able to entrap the Money Laundering Law (AML). "Therefore, the data were not strong enough to AML. If strong yes definitely we apply AML chapters, "he said.
According to Johan, there are some cases that the Commission investigated and investigated by LHA. One example is the case of alleged money laundering by Banggar member of the National Mandate Party, Wa Ode Nurhayati.
No comments:
Post a Comment