Sundari see findings Centre for INTRAC over 20 members Banggar a suspicious transaction occurs because it is still opening up opportunities in the discussion

Sundari see findings Centre for INTRAC over 20 members Banggar a suspicious transaction occurs because it is still opening up opportunities in the discussion



Member of Commission III Eva Kusuma Sundari see findings Centre for Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (INTRAC) over 20 members Banggar a suspicious transaction occurs because it is still opening up opportunities in the discussion of the budget negotiations.

The findings that INTRAC was expected to close the opportunity.

"I consider it important for the improvement of the budgeting system. Close negotiation spaces in budget allocation decisions," said Eva, Thursday (03/01/2013), when contacted by reporters.

Eva said negotiations mundul opportunity because the government does not have the database needs in all sectors in each region.

"The absence of this database led negotiations politicians in the government and fueled corruption. Databases situation schools have baseball, then run to the Principals Principals-assisted negotiations Jakarta for politicians," he said.

However, Eva revealed PPATK still must uphold the principle of presumption of innocence. Because transactions can not be directly identified suspicious called corruption.

"So there needs to be confirmation from investigators about the status of these transactions. PPATK analysis is good but also to narrow the corrupt behavior," said PDI-Struggle politician.

INTRAC has been reported up to now 20 members of the House Budget Agency has indicated corruption and fat bank accounts to the Commission. Of the 20 people, there is an accumulated value of transactions reached hundreds of billions of dollars.

"A suspicious transactions undertaken by the members of Banggar it ranges hundreds of millions of dollars to billions of dollars per transaction. If accumulated, there is a value of transactions reached hundreds of billions of dollars," said Head of INTRAC Muhammad Yusuf.

According to Joseph, there are some considerations that are used to declare the members indicated that Banggar corruption. First, Banggar activities prone to corruption due to taking care of hundreds of trillions of dollars the state budget.

Second, the frequency of financial transactions Banggar members that do not fit her profile as a member of Parliament. Flow into the accounts of cash transactions that generally Banggar PPATK could not detect the origin of the money.