there are 40 institutions nonstructural that will be dissolved again

Jokowi and SBY

there are 40 institutions nonstructural that will be dissolved again 

 MERDEKA.COM. President Jokowi dissolving action 10 non structural last week, received appreciation from many walks of life. Vice Chairman of the House Fahri Hamzah who usually cynical over anything done president, this time joined thumbs up. This is a good step from the government, he said.

 Fahri also encouraged to continue to conduct a review of a number of non structural. If the functions overlap with the ministry, just disband. Further strengthen the relevant ministries for the sake of saving. House agree.

 The number of non-structural growth over the last 15 years, was remarkable. According Kemenpan, now the number menjacapai 87 institutions. This institution began to be formed in the era of Gus Dur, Megawati, to SBY. Because SBY's longest, most SBY also shape it.

 Like herding, SBY continue to bear and nurture non structural. Plea and warning not to pass on the farm, rather than nothing. But ignored. Understandably, non-structural institution can be a place of devotion for those who think it is still necessary SBY state.

 Since 2010, Kemenpan and RB, has conducted a study on the existence and effectiveness of non-structural institutions. Even the ministry immediately recommended that the number of institutions dissolved. But, SBY let alone. In fact, continue to add new institutions.

 What do Jokowi just follow up on recommendations and RB Kemenpan. Jokowi prove what he said: many studies, discussions and seminars have often, it was also clear recommendations; all it takes is execution.

 Now, Jokowi and his team are studying the results of the study Kemenpan back and RB to dissolve 40 non structural again. As told by Chief Cabinet Secretary Andi Widjajanto, which is being discussed is the impact of the dissolution of government institutions such non-structural.

 First, about the budget that was already allocated to these institutions. Second, the issue of settlement if these institutions are already under contract procurement of goods and services with other parties. Third, the issue of transfer of employees.

 Although the value of the budget is not negligible compared with the ministry, as well as the number of employees, but due to the number of non-structural institution is a lot, then the result is also a significant time saving budget. The government also does not need to hire more employees, because they can take advantage of existing employees.

 Remember, the total amount of expenditure for employees in this country is still high. Even in some areas, the amount of expenditure pengawai mencapi 75% of the total expenditure budget. It is not only burden the state budget, but also make the country can not invest, move the productive sectors of the economy.

 The birth of a new state agency originally was required to resolve the problems can not be solved by the existing state institutions. For example, the Commission is required to combat corruption, money laundering required to deal with INTRAC, and to hold free elections required the Commission.

 But the journey later, the establishment of these institutions are not in control, especially non-structural institutions that functioned to compensate ministerial tasks. Moreover, the establishment of these institutions need enough government regulation and regulatory / presidential decree.

 Seen basic formation, state institutions (new) can be divided into three types: first, that the form of the constitutional institutions, such as MK, KY, and the Commission; second, an institution established by law, such as the Commission, INTRAC, KPI, and KIP; and third, base institutions established government regulations and rules / decision of the president, such as the National Aviation Council, the National Book Council, and the National Law Commission.

 Against state agencies established pursuant to the constitution, it certainly can not be bothered. But the institutions established by government regulation and legislation / decision of the president, Jokowi do not have to think long. If the results of the study Kemenpan recommend dissolution, yes disband.

 Which is rather difficult is concerned state agencies established by law. In addition to required depth and comprehensive study, the president needs to discuss with the Parliament. For institutions that clear benefits, such as the Commission needs to be maintained and developed. But for organizations that are not obvious contribution but spending state funds, such as Bawaslu (Election Watching), so do not hesitate to dissolve.