 |
| Abraham Samad |
Chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Abraham Samad sentencing judge panel of the Court of Corruption (Corruption) against Angelina Sondakh aka Angie wrong.According to Samad, Angie should be sentenced in accordance with the demands of the public prosecutor (prosecutor).
"According to my subjectivity, there is a mistake on the judge, not the prosecutor KPK," said Samad KY office, Jakarta, Wednesday (16/01/2013).
Samad stressed, he has studied the prosecutor demands on Angie carefully. According to him, the formal legal, prosecutors claim was not problematic. In fact, he argues, demands a powerful prosecutor. "I study the indictment and purposes, none of which are weak. KPK prosecutors already right. Perception of judges may not be equal to the prosecutor," he said.
He further emphasized that the Commission has not reported Angie trial judges to the Judicial Commission. Therefore, the lead agency is still discussing the decision verdict. Enforcement agencies, he said, was there any discussion of ethics code violations in the sentencing judge Angie.
Meanwhile, the Chairman of the Judicial Eman Suparman said the agency still check Angie verdict. Additionally, KY unfinished conduct retesting of the entire trial Angie.
"We are still monitoring the trial, the results of the A to Z trial we are though. Till now not finished," said Eman.
Eman emphasized, KY entirely Angie verdict will submit fully to the Commission. Therefore, the domain of irregularities, including Angie criminal convictions. According to him, if found bribery allegations, the Commission will total handling the case.
"I discovered there was an issue of bribery, will be submitted to the Commission," said Eman.
As reported, Angie lighter sentence than prosecutors claim. Angie was sentenced to four years and six months in prison plus a fine of Rp 250 million subsidiary imprisonment of six months. Magistrate judge, Angie convicted of corruption is continuing to receive a gift of money worth a total of USD 2.5 billion and 1.2 million dollars from Permai Group.
The verdict was read Corruption judges consisting of Sudjatmiko (chairman), Marsudin Nainggolan, l Afiantara, Hendra Yosfin, and Alexander alternately in the trial which took place at the Jakarta Corruption Court on Thursday (1/10/2013) ago. The verdict is much lighter than the prosecution requested that the Commission Angie sentenced to 12 years in prison plus a fine of Rp 500 million subsidiary six months in prison.
This ruling also frees Angie from the demands of the state to pay damages in accordance with the value of money dikorupsinya as demanded by KPK prosecutors. The amount of money received Angie was considered proven differed with prosecutors.
According to the judges, Angie only proved receiving Rp 2.5 billion and 1.2 million U.S. dollars, or approximately USD 14.5 billion. Meanwhile, according to prosecutors, Angie for receiving money worth a total of Rp 12.58 billion and 2.35 million U.S. dollars in 2010. The judge also considered unproven Angie led the project budget Kemenpora homestead SEA Games athletes.
Angelina Sondakh or Angie sentenced to 4 years and 6 months in jail and a fine of Rp 250 million subsidiary imprisonment of 6 months over alleged bribe-taking maintenance budget in the Ministry of Youth and Sports and the Ministry of National Education. The verdict is much lighter than the prosecution requested that the Commission Angie sentenced to 12 years in prison plus a fine of Rp 500 million subsidiary six months in prison.
Activists Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) Donal Fariz judge, the decision of the judges is very disappointing. The verdicts were much lighter than the suit will not provide a deterrent effect for Angie and other criminals.
"The verdict is in no way provide a deterrent for Angie and corrupt. It even looks favorable Angie. And more beneficial because the state seized assets. Though sentenced to seize assets impoverish convicted of corruption, "said Donal when contacted on Friday (01/11/2013).
Hearing the judges verdict in Jakarta Corruption Court on Thursday (01/10/2013), Angie seemed quiet. He's not sobbing like when reading the defense memorandum in the trial some time ago.
This ruling does not require the state to pay damages Angie accordance with the value of money allegedly dikorupsinya as demanded by KPK prosecutors.
Regarding the amount of money received Angie was considered proven differed with prosecutors. According to the judges, Angie only proved receiving Rp 2.5 billion and 1.2 million U.S. dollars, or approximately USD 14.5 billion. Meanwhile, according to prosecutors, Angie for receiving money worth a total of Rp 12.58 billion and 2.35 million U.S. dollars in 2010. The judge also considered unproven Angie led the project budget Kemenpora homestead SEA Games athletes.
The length of the sentence the judge decided Angie is much lighter than the prosecution because of the application of the different chapters. Angie judges found to have violated Article 11 of the Law on Corruption Eradication in conjunction with Article 64 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, while prosecutors chose a letter of Article 12 in conjunction with Article 18 of the Law on the Eradication of Corruption in conjunction with Article 64 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, the penalties are more severe, the maximum 20 years in prison.
In this regard, according to Donald, the judge is not sensitive to the demands and give irrational considerations.
"That's odd money from corruption is not confiscated by the state. It's not logical at all claims to receive no money in the eyes of the judge was right. But the judge also only apply article 11, article 12 does not choose a punishment more severe, "he said.
Not to mention, added Donal, corruption by Angie is in the public interest in education. The verdict is very far from the expectations of society.
"The verdict is very disappointing and made public were injured. Therefore, this case study facilities enjoyed by the public, "he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment